HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6414 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos.1 and 2. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- i.e. Naib Tahsildar, Barausa, Tahsil- Jaysinghpur, District Sultanpur to decide the Mutation Case No. 459/1995, titled as Indramani Vs. Ram Hausila, under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, relating to Village - Bagiya Gaon, Pargana Barausa, Tehsil Jaysinghpur, District Sultanpur, within reasonable time, as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 Naib Tahsildar, Barausa, Tahsil- Jaysinghpur, District Sultanpur is desired to make all endeavor to decide the Mutation Case No. 459/1995, titled as Indramani Vs. Ram Hausila, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar, Ashok Kumar Pandey, Brijendra Mohan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Prem Sagar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, relating to Village - Bagiya Gaon, Pargana Barausa, Tehsil Jaysinghpur, District Sultanpur, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6414 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench