SHANKAR BAIRAGI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN.SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME
/10290/2023 · 2025-11-19
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10290 of 2023 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. No one appears on behalf of the applicant even in the revised list.
2. It is informed by the learned A.G.A. that the trial has been concluded.
3. In view of above, the application is rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. November 19, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Vivek Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Shankar Bairagi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. Of Home .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench