BRAJESH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
/12174/2025 · 2025-12-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178513 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178513 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12174 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.311 of 2025, under Sections 64(2) M, 351(3), 352-B of BNS, Police Station Raunahi, District Ayodhya.
3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the informant was alone at home around two months ago when the applicant came and committed wrong on her and thereafter issued threats. In the statement under Section 180 of BNSS, the victim disclosed her age as 24 years and stated that her husband had gone to Delhi and when no one was at home, the applicant came and committed wrong on her and threats were also issued. The victim had refused to undergo medical examination.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the age of the victim and the fact that physical relations were formed on various occasions; the victim has refused to undergo medical examination and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 20.07.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Brajesh Yadav be released on bail in the abovesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Brajesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 9, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12174 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench