Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178504 (ALL)

VIJAY SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/12712/2025 · 2025-10-31

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12712 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing and commanding opposite parties to pay salary of suspension period from 15.01.2005 to 20.05.2007, salary of first termination period from 21.05.2007 to 05.02.20213, salary of second termination from 15.06.2015 to 05.08.2016, arrears of increments, transfer allowances and other service benefits with interest to petitioner as early as possible, in the interest of justice." 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director General (Prosecution), U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 31, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vijay Shankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench