MD. VASEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/8810/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178501 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178501 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8810 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Anshuman Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1.
2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. (erstwhile 482 Cr.P.C.) has been filed seeking setting aside the order dated 09.03.2021 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ayodhya in Case No.363 of 2019, Sayra Bano Vs. Mohd. Waseem, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Khandasa, District Ayodhya.
3. Learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection that against the impugned order dated 09.03.2021, there is a remedy of appeal before the High Court under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act and the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable.
4. Counsel for the applicant has also not disputed the aforesaid fact.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the present application is rejected leaving open to the applicant to seek legal remedy as available under law. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Asad Mahmood, Shujat Kidwai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Md. Vaseem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. November 20, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 8810 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench