HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4485 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners, as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 6, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Nafeesh Quraishi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Anjali Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench