HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9381 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Ashish Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party No. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 99 of 2019 pursuant to charge-sheet 86/2019 dated 11.02.2019 filed in Case Crime No.0547 of 2018, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313, 377 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D. P. Act, Police Station-Bangermau, District Unnao. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated 03.03.2025 passed in Application under Section 482 CrPC No. 1894 of 2025, a direction was given to the court concerned to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned court concerned had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court concerned vide report/order dated 03.04.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : O.P. Tiwari, Gaurav Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Navneet @ Navneet Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court concerned. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of matrimonial nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 99 of 2019 pursuant to charge-sheet 86/2019 dated 11.02.2019 filed in Case Crime No.0547 of 2018, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313, 377 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D. P. Act, Police Station-Bangermau, District Unnao are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. November 11, 2025 Raj A482 No. 9381 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench