Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178474 (MAD)

VIGNESH v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/50467/2025 · 2025-12-26

V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No.50467 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No.50467 of 2025 Vignesh S/o M.Saravanan 1st Floor, AGR Villa Anand Nagar 8th Cross Street, Thoripakkam Chennai-600 097 Petitioner Vs 1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary Ministry of External Affairs, 74B South Block, New Delhi-110011 2. Public Grievance Cell Officer PSP Division Ministry of External Affairs Room No.24, Patiala House Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 3.The Regional Passport Officer W8FM, 99J, Post Office Passport Seva Kendra, HPO Arcot-Kanchipuram Road Ranipet-632 401 4. The Regional Passport Officer Chennai Royala Towers No.2 and 3 IV Floor, Old No.785, New No.158 Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002 5. State of Tamilnadu Rep.by its Inspector of Police Tiruvannmalai Town Police Station https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.50467 of 2025 Thiruvannamalai. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to issue Fresh Passport to the petitioner as per Application No.MAB066001431125 dated 17.11.2025 within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents: Mr.K.B.Arul Central Government Standing Counsel for R1 to R4 ORDER The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to issue a passport to him. The petitioner is a software engineer working with a multi- national company. During the course of his work, he is called upon to travel abroad. Hence he applied for issuance of a passport to the third respondent. The third respondent sought for a clarification from the fourth respondent. The clarification was as regards a criminal case that has been filed against him in Crime No.366 of 2024 by the fifth respondent. The petitioner states that the final report was filed and the same has been taken on file before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Thiruvannamalai as C.C.No.953 of 2025. He pleads that the case is still at the stage of trial. On account of the pressing necessities of work, he requires the passport and hence has filed this writ petition. 2. I heard Mr.K.B.Arul for the respondents 1 to 4. I have gone through the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.50467 of 2025 papers and carefully considered the submissions of both sides. 3. For the mere fact that a criminal complaint is pending does not mean that the petitioner should be barred from receiving a passport. The petitioner shall file an appropriate application before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Thiruvannamalai in C.C.No.953 of 2025 seeking permission of the Court to leave the country. In the event of the application being allowed, the respondents 1 to 4 on the said basis shall issue the passport. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 26-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ss https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.50467 of 2025 To 1.The Secretary to Union of India Ministry of External Affairs 74B South Block, New Delhi-110011 2.Public Grievance Cell Officer PSP Division Ministry of External Affairs, Room No.24, Patiala House, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 3.The Regional Passport Officer W8FM, 99J, Post Office, Passport Seva Kendra, HPO, Arcot-Kanchipuram Road Ranipet-632 401 4.The Regional Passport Officer Chennai Royala Towers No.2 and 3 IV Floor, Old No.785, New No.158, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002 5. The Inspector of Police Tiruvannmalai Town Police Station Thiruvannamalai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.50467 of 2025 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. ss WP No. 50467 of 2025 26-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis