Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178458 (ALL)

SAROJ MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/10351/2025 · 2025-11-06

Alok Mathur, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10351 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Janendra Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner's husband namely Awadh Ram met with an accident, where he had caught fire on 12.11.2021 and succumbed to injuries during treatment at Civil Hospital, Lucknow. In the aforesaid circumstances claim was made by the petitioner as per "Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatana Kalyan Yojana" (hereinafter referred to as "the Scheme"). Alongwith the appropriate application the petitioner had submitted all relevant documents including post mortem report, but claim of petitioner was rejected by order dated 12.01.2024, stating that her husband has retired from Agriculture Department and therefore deceased as a Government Servant and was not covered under the said Scheme. The petitioner by means of present writ petition has assailed order dated 12.01.2024. 3. When the matter has been taken up today, learned Standing Counsel has produced before this Court a copy of order dated 27.10.2025, passed by the District Magistrate, Barabanki. It seems that on receipt of copy of present writ petition, entire facts were re-examined at the stage of District Magistrate, Barabanki. A report was submitted before him, according to which the petitioner fulfilled all the conditions of the Scheme, accordingly, decision has been taken to grant compensation to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janendra Kumar Verma, Vivek Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Saroj Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner, to which she is entitled as per the said Scheme. Copy of order dated 27.10.2025 has been given to the petitioner and also placed on record of present writ petition. 4. In the light of fact that respondents themselves have re-visited the facts and allowed the claim of petitioner as per aforesaid Scheme, no further directions are required to be passed. 5. Accordingly, present writ petition is consigned to records. November 6, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 10351 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench