GAYADEEN @ RAJU PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME) LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/7472/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178452 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178452 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7472 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.130 of 2025, under Sections 65(1), 333, 352, 351(3) BNS and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Baldirai, District Sultanpur.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that allegations were levelled through an application under Section 173(4) BNSS that the applicant had committed wrong on daughter of the informant. Subsequently the victim as well as the informant have not supported the prosecution story during the trial.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 30.5.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Gayadeen @ Raju Pandey be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukh Deo Singh, Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gayadeen @ Raju Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7472 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench