HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10602 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. The present writ petition is misconceived. It relates to alleged paddy having been sowed by the petitioner in the field of Gram Sabha. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the proceeding under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 has been already initiated. 3. In light of the submission(s) made above, we do no find any merit in the present petition. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach before the authority concerned for redressal of his grievance. November 4, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhagwati Prasad Nigam, Anurag Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Rajendra Yadav @ Rajendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench