Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17844 (KAR)

M/S ROYAL SWITCH DESIGNS v. M/S MACRO AGENCIES PVT LTD

CRL.RP/304/2024 · 2025-02-13

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6484 CRL.RP No. 304 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.304 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. M/S ROYAL SWITCH DESIGNS NO.267, FIRST ‘L’ MAIN ROAD SHIVASHAKTHI H P GAS BUILDING K G B C S LAYOUT SHARADA COLONY BASAVESHWARANAGARA BANGALORE-560079 2. MR. PRASHANTH S/O LATE MALLIKARJUNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS M/S ROYAL SWITCH DESIGNS NO.267, FIRST ‘L’ MAIN ROAD SHIVASHAKTHI H P GAS BUILDING K G B C S LAYOUT SHARADA COLONY BASAVESHWARANAGARA BANGALORE-560079 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI VASANTHA KUMAR V, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: M/S MACRO AGENCIES PVT LTD REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED DIRECTOR Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6484 CRL.RP No. 304 of 2024 SRI V NAGARJUNAN HAVING OFFICE AT NO.38-A-A DODDANEKKUNDI INDUSTRIAL AREA WHITEFIELD ROAD BANGALORE-560045 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRASANNA KUMAR NAYAKA S H.,ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.12.2023 DISMISSING CRL.A.NO.205/2021 PASSED BY THE LXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-62) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the respondent submits that this Court suspended the sentence vide order dated 15.03.2024 directing petitioner No.2 to deposit 50% of the fine amount including the amount, if any already deposited before the Trial Court within four weeks and also ordered for issuance of notice to the respondent. But the said order has not been complied and PF also not yet paid by the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6484 CRL.RP No. 304 of 2024 petitioners. The learned counsel for the respondent further submits that he voluntarily appears before the Court and he also produced the order sheet to show that in terms of the order of this Court dated 15.03.2024, there is no compliance. None appears for the petitioners. In view of non-compliance of order of this Court dated 15.03.2024 and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN