APHC010245052007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2654 OF 2007 Between: G. Veeraswamy, S/o. Gangisetti, Aged about 44 Years, Occ: Unemployee, C/o. Tirupathi Korlagunta, H.No. 20-2-658/B, R/o. Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary Labour, Employment and Training Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Chairman Cum Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Anantapur. 3. The Commissioner Tirupathi Municipality, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus calling for the records relating to the orders passed in ID No. 58/2003 dt. 15-9-2006 on the file of the 2"^ respondent- Court and which was published vide G.O.Rt.No. 2372, Labour Employment Training & Factories (Lab.I) Department, Dt. 13-11-2006 by the first respondent and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles and contrary to the provisions of the I.D.-Act and further declare that •V- the petitioner is entitled for reinstatement, continuity of service and full back wages from the date of termination till the date of reinstatement. lA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 3405 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to expediate early hearing of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BHASKAR REDDY FOR SRI P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI DAMERLA RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following order: i APHC010245052007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] a.: >- FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2654/2007 Between: 1.G. VEERASWAMY,, S/0. GANGISETTI, UNEMPLOYEE, C/0. TIRUPATHI KORLAGUNTA, H.NO. 20-2-658/B, R/0. TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.LABOUR EMPLOY TRAINING DEf^T 2 ORS, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY LABOUR, EMPLOYEMENT AND TRAINING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2.THE CHAIRMANCUMPRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, ANANTAPUR. 3.THECOMMISSIONER TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus calling for the records relating to the orders passed in ID No. 58/2003 dt.15-9-2006 on the file of the 2nd respondent-Court and which was published vide G.O.Rt.No. 2372, Labour Employment Training & Factories (Lab.I) Department, Dt. 13-11-2006 by the first respondent and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles and contrary to the provisions of the I.D. Act and further declare that the petitioner is entitled for reinstatement, continuity of service and full back wages from the date of termination till the date of reinstatement and pass such other order or orders as this Hon ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. JA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 3405 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite early hearing of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR LABOUR 2.DAMERLA RAVI KUMAR to % The Court made the following order: Sri Bhaskar Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri P.Raghavender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. mode, Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI ON OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri P. Raghavendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Labour, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri Damerla Ravi Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies Cnr '-t HIGH COURT DATED:18/07/2025 I SEP 2025 V*o^"*"'Sectio ORDER WP NO. 2654 OF 2007 OV ml <%>/ £^tcheo5 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS