Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178424 (ALL)

VIMLESH SINGH v. COLLECTOR BAHRAICH DISTT. BAHRAICH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/10677/2025 · 2025-11-04

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10677 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Mrs. Roshni Singh and submits that he wishes to be impleaded as a party as it is upon her complaint that the impugned order has been passed against the petitioner. 2. Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of Mrs. Roshni Singh, which is taken on record. 3. The petitioner is directed to add Mrs. Roshni Singh in the array of the parties. 4. Upon perusal of the impugned order, we are of the view that the challenge to the said impugned order should be by way of an appeal as provided under Section 6 of the U.P. Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011. 5. In light of the same, we direct the petitioner to file an appeal before respondent No.1 within a period of one week from date. If such an appeal is filed within a period of one week, the authority concerned is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to the added respondent and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of 8 weeks from date. 6. Till passing of the said order, the cancellation of the EWS certificate of the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajey Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vimlesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) Collector Bahraich Distt. Bahraich And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10677 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench