UMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/12779/2025 · 2025-11-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178419 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178419 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12779 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned not to cancel allotment of premises/House No.220, Type-1, situated at Police Line, Sitapur.
3. It has been submitted that although petitioner has been transferred in November, 2023 but seeks to retain the accommodation provided, in view of fact that studies of petitioner's daughter would be hampered.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Sitapur. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 4, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Umesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench