Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17840 (KAR)

M.H.CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/370/2022 · 2025-04-17

Krishna S Dixit

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15968 RP No. 370 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT REVIEW PETITION NO. 370 OF 2022 BETWEEN: M.H.CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O HANUMAIAH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FACTORIES IN BOILER INDSUTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH, KALYANA SURAKSHA BHAVAN, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, DAIRY CIRCLE, BANGALORE 560 029. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DEEPAK., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KESHAVA BHAT A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY ITS ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560 001. 2. THE DIRCTOR OF FACTORIES IN BOILERS INDSUTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH KALYANA SURAKSHA BHAVAN BANNERGHATTA ROAD, DAIRY CIRCLE, BANGLAORE 560 029. 3. THE DISTRICT CASTE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KANDAYA BHAVANA, BANGALORE 560 009. 4. THE COMMISSIONER FOR SOCIAL WELFARE AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY, M S BUILDING, BANGLAORE 560 001. Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15968 RP No. 370 of 2022 5. THE TAHASILDAR, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE 560 010. 6. GANGADHAR PERUR, S/O GANGAPPA PERUR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO 104, PEDDAYYANA HAKKAL, INDIRANAGARA, P V ROAD, HUBLI, DHARWAD 580 024. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 47 RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 05/10/2021 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO. 16370/2021 (GM-CC) VIDE ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has moved a Memo dated 17.4.2025, which reads as under: “The petitioner in the above Review Petition is not in interest to prosecute the above review petition. Hence the above Review Petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of Justice.” In view of the above, leave is granted and petition is disposed off as having been withdrawn. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15968 RP No. 370 of 2022 Costs made easy. Registry to send a copy of this order by Speed Post to the respondents, forthwith. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE cbc List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8