P VENKATA RAMANA v. SRI CH DWARAKA TIRUMALA RAO IPS
CC/2357/2025 · 2026-05-07
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1784 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1784 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010450472025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2357/2025 Between:
1. P VENKATA RAMANA, S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY, AGED 58 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SENIOR ASSISTANT, E. 452966, O/O. THE PARVATHIPURAM DEPOT, A.P.S.R.T.C., R/O. BELAGAM, PARVATHIPURAM, MANYAM DISTRICT.
PREVIOUSLY VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI CH DWARAKA TIRUMALA RAO IPS, VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (A.P.S.R.T.C.) PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT.
2. SRI P VENKATESWARA RAO, REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DPTO, APSRTC, PARVATHIPURAM, MANYAM DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
3. SMT E SATYA KANAGA DURGA, DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C.
PARVATHIPURAM DEPOT, PARVATHIPURAM, MANYAM DISTRICT.
PREVIOUSLY VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents/ contemnors and punish them under Sections-10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for willfully and deliberately
2
violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated. 29.11.2024 passed in W.P. 12028 of 2012 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. K SRINIVASA PRASAD SC For APSRTC The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.12028 of 2012, dated 29.11.2024 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
08.05.2026 PNS