SHATROHAN TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDU. L
WRIA/3018/2014 · 2025-12-04
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178397 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178397 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3018 of 2014 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. (I.A. No. 7/2025-Withdrawal)
1. This is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition as withdrawn. The application is supported by an affidavit. The writ petition was filed for extension of service up to 62 years which is pending since the year 2014 and now the petitioner has attained the age of 72 years and he does not want to pursue the writ petition.
2. The affidavit does not make any mention for granting a liberty to file a fresh petition. Although such a statement has been made in the application, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the statements made in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the petitioner does not want any liberty to file a fresh petition.
3. Accordingly, the application for withdrawal of the writ petition is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. December 4, 2025 Pradeep/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Singh, Ratnesh Kumar Tripathi, Rupendra Kumar Parwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shatrohan Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Edu. L .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench