Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178395 (ALL)

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH v. VIJAY PRAKASH SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

A227/6211/2025 · 2025-10-30

Subhash Vidyarthi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6211 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Harshit Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 2. Keeping in view the nature of reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Musafirkhana, District Sultanpur for expeditious disposal of Original Suit No.70 of 2016: Vijay Prakash Singh Vs. Ram Kishore Mallaah. 4. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiff-Vijay Prakash Singh (opposite party no.1) against Ram Kishore Mallaah (opposite party no.2 seeking a decree for perpetual injunction. The petitioner and the opposite parties no.3 to 5 filed an application for impleadment stating that the property in dispute belonged to them. The impleadment application was allowed and the petitioners filed their written statement on 20.11.2019. The original sole defendant in the suit has also filed written statement on 11.05.2022. The trial court has passed an order dated 09.03.2016 directing the parties to maintain status-quo, but the petitioner and the opposite parties no.3 to 5 were not the parties to the suit at that time, however, the said order is still continuing. 5. In these circumstances expeditious disposal of suit appears to be necessary in the interest of justice. 6. Accordingly, petition is disposed of by issuing a direction to the earned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Musafirkhana, District Sultanpur to decide the Original Suit No.70 of 2016: Vijay Prakash Singh Vs. Ram Kishore Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh, Harshit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vivek Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Vijay Prakash Singh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Mallah expeditiously in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties. October 30, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 6211 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench