SHYAM KRISHNA MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1694/2025 · 2025-11-18
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178393 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178393 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1694 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2.
2. Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
3. It is informed by the learned counsel for the parties that till today, no order has been passed by the Magistrate on the application moved by the applicant under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., but F.I.R. No. 333 of 2025, under Sections 120B, 420, 468, 506 I.P.C. has been registered on the complaint of the complainant at P.S. Zaidpur, District Barabanki.
4. As learned counsel for the complainant also informs that the F.I.R. is already registered, therefore, the present application has lost its efficacy.
5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed with liberty to the applicant to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. November 18, 2025 VKS Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durgendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ashish Kumar (Rajeev Singh,J.) Shyam Krishna Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench