Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178391 (ALL)

BRIJ MOHAN SHARMA @ MUKESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIB/1185/2025 · 2025-12-10

Alok Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1185 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shailesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 8. 2. Preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that in the present writ petition the petitioner has raised serious issue with regard to encroachment of the Nagar Nigam's land by the private respondents, hence present writ petition is not maintainable at the behest of petitioner and that the issue may be raised in a Public Interest Litigation. 3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file Public Interest Litigation. 4. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file Public Interest Litigation. December 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey, Namit Sharma (Alok Mathur,J.) Brij Mohan Sharma @ Mukesh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench