HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14702 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Mr. Manish Mani Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Gaurav Mehrotra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Prashast Puri, counsel for respondent nos. 5 & 6, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The present writ petition has been filed with following prayers:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Opp. Party no. 5 and 6 i.e. Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Sansthagat Sewa Mandal, Lucknow and Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Sansthagat Sewa Mandal, Lucknow not to remove Petitioner and permit him to continue his service as driver, in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Respondents to pay regular salary to the Petitioner, in the interest of Justice. III. Issue any other order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner." The contention put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis in year 2003 and since then, he was working to the best satisfaction of this superiors. He submitted that all of sudden on 03.11.2025, the order passed, wherein, it was directed that he shall submit the key and logbook including the other documents in the divisional office of the respondent. He submitted that after 03.11.2025 the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashast Puri Surendra Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Co-Operative Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner will not be allowed to work. After the aforesaid argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to move a fresh representation before respondent no. 6 and he may be directed to sympathetically consider and decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels appearing for the respondents have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. This Court while considering the petitioner is working since 2003 in the department as Driver has been stopped to work on 03.11.2025, after rendering of his 22 years of services, therefore, the petitioner is permitted to move fresh representation before the respondent no. 6/Secretary, Uttar Pradash Co-operative Sansthagat Sewa Mandal, ICCMRT Bhawan, District Lucknow, within period of three days and on such representation, the authorities shall take decision, within further period of ten days. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of December 18, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 14702 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench