SMT. SUDHARANI AND ANOTHER v. SMT. KAMARULNISHA AND ANOTHER
A227/6894/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178383 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6894 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Onkar Nath Tiwari, the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. A supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioners, is taken on record.
3. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioners are seeking issuance of a direction to Civil Judge (Junior Division)/ F.T.C., District Ayodhya to expeditiously decide the Regular Suit No. 911 of 2019.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that service of summons on the defendants have been affected in the month of July, 2025 and only one of the defendants has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama.
5. In these circumstances, there is no reason to issue any direction for expeditious disposal of the suit, at this stage.
6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of while granting a liberty to the petitioners to move appropriate application before the trial court. December 1, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Smt. Sudharani And Another .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Kamarulnisha And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench