VIKAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/5101/2025 · 2025-11-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178367 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178367 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5101 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 0164/2025, under Section 105, 281, 75(2), 115(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, 2023, Police Station - Banthara, District - Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that wife of the informed had been called for applying mehendi in a marriage function and was taken by the three co-accused. It was also stated that along with wife, her cousin sister had also gone and subsequently, information was received that all the three accused tried to commit wrong on her and was also beaten very badly with knife, subsequently, to conceal the offense, the accused was cause which resulted vehicle being overturned. In the light of the said, learned counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the post-mortem report where cause of death is anti-mortem spinal injury and thirteen injuries were present on the body which are wounds which can arise out of an accident. He states that no injury of any knife are present on the body of the deceased and thus, according to him it was a cause of simple accident. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that neither the applicant was driving the vehicle nor allegation of causing injuries were subsequently assigned to the accused Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jatin Raheja, Shakti Kumar Sharma, Shobhit Harsh Vikas .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 20.04.2025 and has no criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Vikas be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.
20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 10, 2025 Mohit Singh/- BAIL No. 5101 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench