Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178361 (ALL)

CHHANGU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/10321/2025 · 2025-11-06

Alok Mathur, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10321 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Mukesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 6. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private respondent nos. 7 to 9 is hereby dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is co-tenure holder of land bearing Gata No.1288 situated at Village Rechh, Post Meermau, District Faizabad (now Ayodhya) and unauthorizedly at the behest of private respondents, the respondent no.4 is adamant to dispossess the petitioner from the said land. 4. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of written instructions dated 25.10.2025 received from the Tehsildar, Rudauli, Ayodhya, informs this Court that the State respondents have not conducted any exercise of dispossessing the petitioner or even interfering in his possession and accordingly, in light of the aforesaid instructions, no direction is required to be issued to the State respondents, who have unequivocally stated that they are not interfering in the land owned by the petitioner. It is in case the private respondents are interfering in the possession of the petitioner, the petitioner has adequate remedy of filing a civil suit before the court of competent jurisdiction and seeking orders of injunction. 5. After recording the statement made by learned Standing Counsel, no Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Chhangu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) further direction is required to be issued. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 6, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10321 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench