JAGDAMBA PRASAD GUPTA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/2930/2025 · 2025-11-03
Manjive Shukla
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178353 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178353 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2930 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Shri Jalaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State. 2. The captioned criminal appeal has been filed challenging therein, the summoning order dated 27.03.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act/ A.S.J., Balrampur, in Special S.T. No.23 of 2023 (Computerized No.24 of 2023); State versus Jagdamba Prasad Gupta and others, arising out of Case Crime No.204 of 2022, under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3(1)(DHA) and Section 3(2)(5KA) S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Utraula, District Balrampur, whereby the appellant had been summoned to face trial for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3(1)(DHA) and Section 3(2)(5KA) S.C./S.T. Act. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants, at the very outset, has submitted that the appellants shall surrender before the trial court and shall file the application for grant of bail. He has further submitted that this Court may direct the trial court to consider and decide the appellants' application for bail in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Jalaj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Jagdamba Prasad Gupta And Another .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State does not have any objection if the aforesaid limited prayer is allowed in favour of the appellants. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to surrender before the trial court concerned and file the application for bail within a period of four weeks from today and if such application is filed, the trial court is hereby directed to consider and decide the said application, expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). It is further provided that for the period of four weeks, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellants. November 3, 2025 Mohd.
Sharif CRLA No. 2930 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench