JIBRILE v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/10679/2025 · 2025-11-12
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10679 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Ram Vishal Tripathi, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.342 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)(m), 77, 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, Police Station Fakharpur, District Bahraich.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the husband of the informant was staying out of country and the applicant had made certain inappropriate bathing videos and made physical relations on various occasions. It was also alleged that on 11.09.2025,she was forced to sit in a car, however, she somehow manage to escape. The tentative age of the victim is around 37 years.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the inordinate delay in lodging the FIR and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 14.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Jibrile be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Ambrish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jibrile .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 12, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10679 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench