Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178332 (ALL)

AJAY JAUHARI v. STATE OF U.P. and ORS.

A482/7816/2019 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7816 of 2019 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J. Applicant- husband is aggrieved against the order dated 6th January, 2017 passed by Family Court, Lucknow, whereby monthly maintenance of Rs.1000/- as an interim measure has been awarded in favour of opposite party nos.2 and 3, wife and minor son of the applicant, respectively. None for the applicant. As per the averments in the petition, husband has challenged the impugned order on the ground that the wife herself is not willing to reside with him, though, his petition under Section 9 seeking Restitution of Conjugal Rights is also pending adjudication. Broadly, on these grounds he seeks intervention of this Court to challenge the above noticed impugned order. Considering the status of the parties as well as the background of the case, the interim maintenance of Rs.1000/- granted in favour of the opposite party nos.2 and 3 does not call for any interference by this Court in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. December 1, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Amit Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Manoj Bajaj,J.) Ajay Jauhari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench