Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17833 (ALL)

GAJRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/3002/2023 · 2025-09-15

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3002 of 2023 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This criminal appeal has been filed by applicant to quash the entire proceeding as well as the summoning order dated 22.2.2023 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Jalaun at Orai in Complaint Case No. 38 of 2022, under Sections, 323, 354Kha, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)Dha of SC/ST Act, P.S. Churkhi, District Jalaun at Orai. 3. During arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he does not want to press the prayer for quashing of the above mentioned case. His sole prayer is that a direction may be issued to the court below to decide the bail application of the applicant in view of the judgment in the case Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2021 SCC Online SC 922. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application is disposed of with the direction that in case the applicant filed bail application before the court below, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the court below in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (Supra). 5. With the above observations, this criminal appeal is disposed of finally. September 16, 2025 RavindraKSingh Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Chandrakesh Mishra, Sushil Kumar, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Salman Ahmad (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Gajraj Singh .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad