HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1197 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 4 has been accepted by the Office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent No.5. 2. The instant petition has been preferred in the nature of PIL alleging that the pond land has been encroached upon by the private-respondents No.6 to 9. 3. The record would indicate that the petitioner in Para-40 of the petition has clearly stated that the District Magistrate concerned had responded to a letter issued by the petitioner indicating that the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in short, 'the Code, 2006') have been initiated and appropriate action would be taken upon passing of the final orders. 4. Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has also provided a copy of the written instructions, which is taken on record, indicating that the proceedings have already been initiated under Section 67 of the Code, 2006 against the erring respondents. 5. In view of the aforesaid, no further order can be passed. The State has already been taken note of it and have initiated proceedings which Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Rampal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) needless to say shall be taken to its logical conclusion with expedition. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the petition does not survive and is accordingly disposed of. November 25, 2025 Rakesh/- WPIL No. 1197 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench