HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4022 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Shri Ghulam Mohd. Kamil, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for opposite party no. 3 has submitted that the judgment and order dated 23.05.2022, passed in Writ A No. 2942 of 2022 has complied with and a decision has been taken on the representation of the applicant after revisiting the same and an order dated 11.04.2025 has been passed, in pursuance of the Government Order dated 27.02.2015, the copy of order dated 11.04.2025 has been provided during the course of argument, which is taken on record, the photocopy of the same has been provided to learned counsel for the applicant. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the order passed by opposite party no. 3 is not tenable in the eyes of law for the reason that in the order, while rejecting the claim of the applicant, the reason which has been assigned that 15% posts of Class-III employees is to be filled from the Class-IV employees who are High School and having knowledge of typing and 5% seats are to be filled by the persons having Intermediate and having the knowledge of typing, so this 5% would be merged or treated to be merged with 15% posts reserved for the candidates having High School and Intermediate. 4. On being asked from learned counsel for the applicant that what is provided in the Government Order dated 27.02.2015, as relied upon by the opposite party no. 3, while deciding the claim of the applicant, he has submitted that in the government order, the same thing is provided which has been followed by the opposite party no. 3, but this is arbitrary. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ghulam Mohammad Kamil Manoj Kumar Gupta .....Applicant(s) Mukesh Kumar Mishra, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Bangarmau, Distt. Unnao And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the records of the case, it is found that the decision taken by the opposite party no. 3 after revisiting, is on the basis of the Government Order dated 27.02.2025 and as per the admitted case of the learned counsel for the applicant that the government order provides the same as it has been mentioned in the order dated 11.04.2025 i.e the decision taken on the claim of the applicant by the opposite party no. 3, hence, the judgment and order dated 23.05.2022, passed in Writ A No. 2942 of 2022 has been complied with and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present case. 6. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. December 1, 2025 DiVYa CAPL No. 4022 of 2024 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench