Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178312 (ALL)

SATISH SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME) LKO. AND ANOTHER

/9670/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9670 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing the charge sheet no.01 of 2024, dated 29.2.2024, under sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC., Police Station Dewa, District Barabanki as well as summoning order dated 24.12.2024 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.17, Barabanki in Case No.10561 of 2024 (State vs. Siraj Ahmad and others, arising out of Case Crime No.415 of 2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120-B, IPC., Police Station Dewa, District Barabanki. 3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. 5. In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. 6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 7. In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order. 8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. December 2, 2025 Pks Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh K. Tripathi, Barkha Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) Satish Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench