GAGANDEEP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/3952/2024 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178304 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178304 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3952 of 2024
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. It is informed that trial has concluded, as such, the application has rendered infructuous. Present application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. November 24, 2025 nishant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Verma, Arvind Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Ashok Kumar Bhaskar, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Subhash Chandra Yadav (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Gagandeep .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench