Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178288 (ALL)

DINESHMANI RAM NARESH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/10716/2023 · 2025-11-19

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10716 of 2023 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Anil K.Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2. 2. Learned counsel for the complainant has pointed out that though the mediation between the parties is successful, but the terms and conditions mentioned in the settlement agreement dated 28.08.2024 have not been complied with by the applicant. He has drawn the attention of the Court towards Paragraph-6-C of the settlement agreement, which indicates that the parties have agreed that a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- was to be paid by the first party to the second party on or before 30.08.2024 towards first installment and the balance of Rs.29,00,000/- was to to be paid in four installments and the entire amount was to be paid upto 31.12.2024. He further submits that though the first installment was paid to the first party, but the rest of the amount was not paid till 31.12.2024. 3. Counsel for the applicant has also not disputed the fact that the entire amount as stipulated in Paragraph-6C of the settlement agreement has been paid. 4. Considering the fact that the applicant has failed to comply the terms and conditions mentioned in Paragraph-6C of the settlement agreement dated 28.08.2024, this Court is not inclined to grant any further relief to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virijendra Kumar Singh, Amit Kumar Singh, Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anil Kumar Tripathi Dineshmani Ram Naresh Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) the applicant. 5. Application being devoid of merit, is rejected. Interim order is vacated. November 19, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 10716 of 2023 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench