HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1020 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been preferred seeking direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C.-Ist, Pratapgarh to decide case no.91/2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Pratapgarh (State Vs. Umesh Kumar Sahoo & others), pending before him expeditiously. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. December 3, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sameer Shukla, Anil Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Archana Sahoo .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. And 7 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench