SMT. NEETU ARORA TANDAN v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARYENERGY
WRIA/9818/2020 · 2025-12-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9818 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 17, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Chaturvedi, Ashish Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neerav Chitravanshi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Neetu Arora Tandan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretaryenergy .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench