Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17826 (PAT)

Dayanand Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/20245/2016 · 2025-08-25

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20245 of 2016 ====================================================== Dayanand Singh Son of Late Ramswarth Singh, Resident of Village- Pachra Gote, P.S. Tariyani, District- Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Sheohar. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Sheohar. 4. The Additional Collector, Dheohar. 5. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sheohar. 6. The Sub-divisional Officer, Sheohar. 7. The Circle Officer, Tariyani, District- Sheohar. 8. The Officer-in-Charge, P.S. Tariyani, District- Sheohar. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md.Khurshid Alam-Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 25-08-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present writ application has been filed for the following reliefs: “(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Respondent Authorities, especially the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sheohar (Respondent No. 5) to comply its own order dated 20.11.2014 passed in B.L.D. Case No. 89 of 2013-14, whereby and whereunder a direction was given to the Circle Officer, Tariyani to demarcate the disputed land of the petitioner and give delivery of possession to the Petitioner. (ii) For further direction to the District Magistrate to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within time framed with reason and Patna High Court CWJC No.20245 of 2016(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 speaking order. (iii) And for any other relief / reliefs for which you Lordships may deem fit and proper.” 3. It has been accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Title Suit No. 40 of 2016 is pending before the learned Sub-Judge-II, Sheohar and he shall be marking his presence and filing appropriate affidavit. 4. Granting such liberty, the present writ petition is disposed of. Shahnawaz/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U