1 2025:CGHC:43063 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2830 of 2023 1 - Uchit Sharma S/o Bhawani Shankar Sharma Aged About 49 Years R/o 64, Sai Nagar, Jora, Post Jora, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Nava Raipur- Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur-Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Nodal Agency Dr. Khubchand Baghel Ayushman Bharat Pradhanmantri, Jan Arogya Yojna And Mukhyamantri Swasthya Beema Yojna Through It's Chief Executive Officer, Old Nursing Hostel Behind D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Vijendra Katare S/o Shri L.C. Katare, R/o Senior M.I.G. 87, Sector 3, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/08/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 To kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to appointment of the respondent no.4. 10.2 To kindly be pleased to quash the advertisement dated 05.01.2023 (Annexure P/1). 10.3. To kindly direct the respondent no. 1 to 3 to consider the representation and complaint submitted by the petitioner within a stipulated time frame work. 10.4 To kindly direct to the respondent no. 2 to issue fresh advertisement as per rules including the qualification of degree of MBBS as basic qualification and degree of M.D. Community medicine. 10.5 Any other relief(s) which this Hon,ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat