HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 2996 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to struck off the prayer clause (a), during course of the day. The prayer clause (b), (c), (d), (e) are repositioned as prayer clause (a), (b, (c) and (d). Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- " (a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. Party No. 1 to consider and decide the appeal of the petitioner which has been preferred against the impugned order dated 21.10.2024 expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (b) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. Parties to consider the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (c) To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner. (d) To issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature and manner which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the against Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Yadav Prem Nath Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Basic Education And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) the order dated 21.10.2024, an appeal is preferred before the respondent no. 4, the appellate authority and the same is pending consideration. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 4 to consider & decide the appeal, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the appeal, if any, preferred before the respondent no. 4/District Basic Education Officer, Faizabad, pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided, within the period of eight weeks, while affording the opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 26, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 2996 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench