Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178223 (ALL)

PAWAN @ PAPPU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/6654/2025 · 2025-11-28

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6654 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicants seek enlargement on bail in FIR No.91 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 105 of BNS, Police Station Jaitpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that on 08.05.2025, the marriage of the niece was being solemnized when the son of the informant was going for getting glass etc., he met the Barat which was coming from the way, wherein, the family members of the groom was standing near a bus and was abusing, which was opposed by the son of the informant, because of which, he was hit by the said persons by iron rod which resulted in substantial injury and death. The cause of death as per the postmortem report is ante mortem injury. The injury was reflected on the head of the deceased. 4. The Counsel for the applicants argues that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail by the trial court and in terms of the statement of the witnesses, the allegations were levelled against all the persons having cause the injury. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Salman, Ana Fatma, Neeraj Kumar Mishra, Saurabh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Krishna Mohan Pandey, Rakesh Dwivedi Pawan @ Pappu And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Considering the fact that the applicants and the other co-accused were assigned the role of hitting the deceased and the fact that the other co- accused have been enlarged on bail coupled with the fact that the applicants have no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 29.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicants Pawan @ Pappu & Nitish alias Gulab be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on their furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 6654 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench