Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178219 (ALL)

GANGARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

/10942/2025 · 2025-11-27

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10942 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for redressal of a grievance that is private in nature. 3. In our view, the forum chosen by the petitioner is incorrect and the writ petition is not maintainable before this Court. 4. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate court/forum/authority in accordance with law for redressal of his grievances. November 27, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar, Ankur Yadav, Surendra Singh, Vijay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Gangaram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench