HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1985 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.336 of 2025 under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 110, 351(2), 117(2) BNS, P.S. Wazirganj, district Gonda. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Anil Kumar Nishad, Advocate who has filed vakalatnama for the complainant today in court, which is taken on record, and Mr. Rajeev Kumar Verma, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3. The allegation in the prosecution case is that the applicants along with co-accused persons went to the shop of the complainant and abused and assaulted him with lathi, danda and rod and thereafter, the said accused persons fled after threatening the complainant for life. 4.Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the offences are punishable upto seven years. It is a case of false implication. The injured have received simple injuries except two injuries. 5.Learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. have opposite the prayer made by the applicants' counsel and submit that Satyapal Singh has sustained two injuries. His right firearm has been found to be fractured on x-ray. Second injured Saurabh Singh has received six Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sinku @ Harendra Pratap Singh, Vijay Pratap Singh alias Vijay Kumar Singh, Krishna Singh and Vishal Singh alias Anoop Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) injuries. Injury No.1 which is on left elbow joint, found to be fractured. There are two more injured. It is not a case of false implication. 6.I have considered the submission and perused the record. The trial court while rejecting the bail application has given following observations : "पśावली के अवलोकन से िविदत होता है िक वादी DZारा Šथम सूचना िरपोटă मȅ अिभकिथत िकया है िक अिभयुǘगण िदनांक-09.10.2025 को िदन मȅ ढाई बजे एक राय होकर वादी की ɭकान पर आये और गाली गलौज देते ɷये लाठी, डęडा व सिरया से मारा पीटा िजससे वादी पW के लोगो को चोटे आई। अिधक चोट लगने के कारण मौके पर बेहोश हो गये। अिभयǘगण ने जान से मारने की धमकी भी िदया। पśावली पर मजɴब दीपाęशू, सĕयपाल िसह, सौरभ िसह व सवȆश िसह की मूल िचिकĕसा आćया मय ऐĆसरे Ěलेट के संलĈन है, िजनमȅ मजɴबो को चोटे आई है एवं हाथ, पैर की अंगुली फै Ćचर भी है। अिभयोजन की ओर से मजɴबȋ की 11 वकă िचिकĕसा आćया मय िसटी ĥकै न व ऐĆसरे Šĥतुत की गई है, िजनमȅ मजɴबȋ के शरीर पर बɷत अिधक चोटे आना दिशत िकया गया है। मामला गĞभीर Šकृ ित का है। ऐसी िĥथित मȅ अिभुयǘगण को अिŎम जमानत िदया जाना िकसी Šकार से ęयायोिचत Šतीत नहȂ होता है। तėनुसार अिभयुǘगण का अिŎम जमानत Šाथăना पś िनरĥत िकये जाने योĈय है। 7.In view of the submission advanced, perusal of the record, injuries received by the injured, gravity of the injuries as also the statement of the injured, it does not appear to be a case of false implication. It is an exceptional jurisdiction. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. 8.The application is dismissed. December 15, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1985 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench