Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178203 (ALL)

IRSHAN KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

/12048/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12048 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant-Manish Kumar, who is involved in F.I.R./Case Crime No.915 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 317(2) of BNS, 2023, Police Station-Kotwali Sadar, District-Lakhimpur Kheri. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. Learned counsel for applicant further submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR and false recovery has been made which indicates that 30 bhagwa flags, 8 patka, 1 T- shirt and 9 school banners have been recovered from his possession. The applicant has one criminal history which has been explained in para 21 of the bail application. It is lastly contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 26.10.2025. The co-accused Manish Kumar has been granted bail vide order passed in Bail No.11862 of 2025. Learned A.G.A has, however, opposed the prayer for grant of bail but he has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Desh Raj Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Irshan Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, bail order of the co-accused, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail on the ground of parity. Let applicant-Irshan Khan be released on bail in the aforesaid F.I.R./case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following additional conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (1) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (2) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. (3) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. (4) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the period of bail. (5) In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court would be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant. Bail application is allowed. December 2, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 12048 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench