NIRBHAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC SHIKSHA LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/7739/2025 · 2025-11-13
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178197 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178197 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7739 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the prayer clause (i).
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection. Upon aforesaid submissions, the prayer clause (i) is deleted and this shall be incorporated/amended by counsel for the petitioner, during course of the day. The prayer clause (ii), (iii) and (iv) is repositioned as prayer clause (i), (ii) and (iii). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhinav Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to direct the opposite parties to transfer the petitioner on the basis of seniority, in the interest of justice, in favour of the petitioner. (ii) Issue other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner; (iii) allow this writ petition with costs." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Ram Yadav, Monu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abhinav Singh Nirbhay Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin./Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Shiksha Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation while raising his grievance before the respondent no. 3 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 3/Basic Siksha Adhikari, Bangarmau, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 13, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 7739 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench