HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3508 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. None present for petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the State is present. 3. It seems that by efflux of time, matter has become infructuous. 4. The instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. The petitioner is given liberty to file recall application within a period of eight weeks, if he feels that cause of action still survives. 7. Consigned to records. November 13, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Shankar Srivastav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anand Mani Tripathi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mrs. Priti Raj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Basic Edu.Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench