APHC010245372019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI . WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2317 OF 9niQ Between: V. Vidyanatha Reddy, S/o Reddappa Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 44 years Occ Advocate, Wo D.NO 11-39/1,1st Floor, S.V.Nagar, Tirupathi. ...Petitioner AND M. Murandari Alias Murandareswari, W/o J. Balagangadhar Reddy, Hindu Aged about 47 years, R/o Basireddigari Palli Village Mandal, Chittoor District. Jandia Post, Filer ...Respondent Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court pleased to set aside the order dated 26-6-2019 in E.P.NO. 22 of 2017 in O.S. No. 86 of 2012 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge Tirupathi District, A.P. lA NO: 1 OF 201Q may be Chittoor Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings in E.P NO 22 of 2017 in OS NO. 86 of 2012 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P pending disposal of the above CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent: M/s. S. PARINEETA The Court made the following order: APHC010245372019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2317/?niQ Between: V. Vidyanatha Reddy ...PETITIONER AND M Murandari Alias Murandareswari Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VNITESH Counsel for the Respondent: 1.S PARINEETA The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT / / /: ■'v r- HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2317 of 2019 ORDER: 1. The present C.RP is filed questioning the Order dated 26.06.2019 in E.P.No.22 of 2017 in O.S.No.86 of 2012 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. The E.P was filed under Order 21 Rules 37 and 38 of the Procedure Code, 1908. As per the status in e-Courts (CIS), the dispute between the parties was settled before Lok Adalat In that view, no cause survives for adjudication in this Revision. Civil on 09.09.2023. 3. Therefore, the C.R.P is dismissed, as infructuous. 4. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. One CC to SRI. V. NITESH, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to M/s. S PARINEETA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies nm I \' HIGH COURT \ DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 2317 OF 2019 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS