HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 23036 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Snajay Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Kumar Pandey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Jamal Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Nagar Vikas Govt.Of Up Lko.Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench