HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6537 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Ajay Mishra, advocate, holding brief of Mr. A.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the same has lost its efficacy. 2. In view of aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. Consigned to the records. October 30, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Ishan Khanna Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vindhywashini Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Priti Patel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench