HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10696 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Onkar Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents as well as Sri Umesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 4 and 5. 2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has challenged order dated 30.09.2025, passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Ayodhya, passed in exercise of power under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5 has raised preliminary objection that the petitioner has efficacious alternate remedy of challenging the impugned order under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The preliminary objections are taken on record. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner also does not oppose the preliminary objection and submits that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file revision against the impugned order. 5. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. It is however, provided that in case revision is filed by the petitioner within next two weeks, same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. November 7, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh, Umesh Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Prem Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench