HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3303 of 2023 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, Shri Praveen Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioners, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Per contra, learned AGA for the State could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is accordingly dismissed being rendered infructuous. November 4, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Yadav, Aditya Vikram Singh, Nadeem Murtaza Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anurag Shukla, Bhagwati Prasad Nigam, Karun Verma, Manohar Lal Syal, Vivek Kumar Rai, Vivek Kumar Rai (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Dr. Vandana Shukla And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench